Skip to main content
Log in

Management of coastal vegetated shingle in the United Kingdom

  • Published:
Journal of Coastal Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Coastal vegetated shingle is a rare and declining resource worldwide but is found extensively around the UK coastline. Shingle sediments b-axes range between 2 mm and 200 mm and occur as fringing beaches, bars, spits, barrier islands and forelands. Sediment patterns are dependent upon accretion or erosion. With sea-level rise, shingle features tend to move inland. Larger features may support reservoirs of fresh water but risk becoming saline with sea-level rise. Ranker soils may develop but are naturally fragile. Vegetated shingle communities are dependent upon substrate stability, moisture and nutrient availability. Only specialized and some ruderal plants can persist in patterns dependent upon geomorphic history. Coastal defence, agriculture, public access and control of alien species are important factors in habitat management. Because of its dynamic and unusual nature coastal vegetated shingle is an important habitat for environmental education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BAP:

Biodiversity Action Plan

LNR:

Local Nature Reserve

References

  • Bluck, B.J. 1967. Sedimentation of beach gravels: examples from South Wales.J. Sediment. Petrol. 37: 125–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, A.P. & Kidd, R. 1998.Hurst Spit stabilisation scheme—design and construction of beach recharge. Proceedings of the 33rd MAFF Conference of River and Coastal Engineers, pp. 1.1.1.-1.1.13. Keele University, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, R.W.G. & Orford, J.D. 1993. The morphodynamics of coarse clastic beaches and barriers: a short and long term perspective.J. Coastal Res. 15: 158–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, V.J. 1947. Biological flora of the British Isles:Suaeda fruticosa Forsk.J. Ecol. 35: 303–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connell, J.H. & Slatyer, R.O. 1977. Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organisation.Am. Nat. 111: 1119–1144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doody, J.P. & Randall, R.E. 2003.Guidance for the management of coastal vegetated shingle. English Nature, Peterborough, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrell, L. & Randall, R.E. 1992. The distribution ofMertensia maritima (L.) Gray, Oyster Plant, in Ireland.Irish Nat. J. 24: 135–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferry, B.W. 2001. Vegetation of Dungeness shingle: aspects of biodiversity. In: Packham, J.R., Randall, R.E., Barnes, R.S.K. & Neal, A. (eds.)Ecology & geomorphology of coastal shingle, pp. 224–241. Westbury Publishing, Otley, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferry, B., Lodge, N. & Waters, S. 1989Dungeness: a vegetation survey of a shingle beach. Research & Survey in nature conservation, No 26: Nature Conservancy Council, Peterborough, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, D.L., Taylor, R.B., Orford, J.D., Carter, R.W.G. & Shaw, J. 1991. Gravel barrier migration and overstepping.Mar. Geol. 97: 305–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, R.M. 1987. Vegetation establishment on shingle beaches.J. Ecol. 75: 1077–1089.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleason, H.A. 1926. The individualistic concept of the plant association.Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 53: 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidson, C. 1959. Uses and limits of vegetation in shore stabilisation.Geography 44: 241–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, R.M. 1980. Mixed sand and gravel beaches: morphology, processes and sediments.Progr. Phys. Geogr. 4: 189–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, F.W. 1912. The shingle beach as a plant habitat.New Phytol. 11: 73–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orford, J.D. et al. 2001. Origin, development, reworking and breakdown of gravel-dominated coastal barriers in Atlantic Canada: future scenarios for the British Coast. In: Packham, J.R., Randall, R.E., Barnes, R.S.K. & Neal, A. (eds.)Ecology & geomorphology of coastal shingle, pp. 23–55. Westbury Publishing, Otley, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packham, J.R., Randall, R.E., Barnes, R.S.K. & Neal, A. (eds.) 2001.Ecology and geomorphology of coastal shingle. Westbury Publishing, Otley UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterken, G.F. & Hubbard, J.C.E. 1972. The shingle vegetation of southern England: the holly wood on Holmestone Beach, Dungeness.J. Ecol. 60: 547–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pye, K. 2001. The nature and geomorphology of coastal shingle. In: Packham, J.R., Randall, R.E., Barnes, R.S.K. & Neal, A. (eds.)Ecology & geomorphology of coastal shingle, pp. 2–22. Westbury Publishing, Otley, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, R.E. 1973. Shingle Street, Suffolk: an analysis of a geomorphic cycle.Bull. Geol. Soc. Norfolk 24: 15–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, R.E. 1977. Shingle foreshores. In: Barnes, R.S.K. (ed.)The Coastline, pp. 49–61. Wiley, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, R.E. 1992. The shingle vegetation of the coastline of New Zealand: Nelson Boulder Bank and Kaitorete Spit.N.Z. J. Geogr. 93: 11–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, R.E. & Doody, J.P. 1995. Habitat inventories and the European Habitats Directive: the example of shingle beaches. In: Healy, M.J. & Doody, J.P. (eds)Directions in European coastal management, pp. 19–36. Samara Publishing, Cardigan, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, R.E. & Fuller, R.M. 2001. The Orford Shingles, Suffolk, UK: Evolving solutions in coastline management. In: Packham, J.R., Randall, R.E., Barnes, R.S.K. & Neal, A. (eds.)Ecology & geomorphology of coastal shingle, pp. 242–260. Westbury Publishing, Otley, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randall, R.E. & Sneddon, P. 2001. Initiation, development and classification of vegetation on British shingle beaches: a model for conservation management. In: Packham, J.R., Randall, R.E., Barnes, R.S.K. & Neal, A. (eds.)Ecology & geomorphology of coastal shingle, pp. 202–223. Westbury Publishing, Otley, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury, E.J. 1952.Downs and dunes: their plant life and its environment. Bell, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, G.A.M. 1963. The ecology of shingle beach plants.J. Ecol. 51: 517–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, G.A.M. 1965. The shingle vegetation at Dungeness.J. Ecol. 53: 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulmeister, J. & Kirk, R.M., 1993. Evolution of a mixed sand and gravel barrier system in Canterbury, New Zealand, during the Holocene sea-level rise and still stand.Sediment. Geol. 87: 215–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sneddon, P. & Randall, R.E. 1993/1994.Shingle survey of Great Britain. Final Report Appl. 1. Wales, App. 2, Scotland. Appl. 3: England. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walmsley, C.A. & Davy, A.J. 2001. Habitat creation and restoration of damaged shingle communities. In: Packham, J.R., Randall, R.E., Barnes, R.S.K. & Neal, A. (eds.)Ecology & geomorphology of coastal shingle, pp. 409–420. Westbury Publishing, Otley, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whittaker, R.H. 1957. Recent evolution of ecological concepts in relation to the eastern forests of North America.Am. J. Bot. 44: 197–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Randall, R.E. Management of coastal vegetated shingle in the United Kingdom. J Coast Conserv 10, 159–168 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1652/1400-0350(2004)010[0159:MOCVSI]2.0.CO;2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1652/1400-0350(2004)010[0159:MOCVSI]2.0.CO;2

Keywords

Navigation